<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Convert &#8211; A Revenue Earning Idea for Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideatagging.com/facebook-convert-a-revenue-earning-idea-for-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideatagging.com/facebook-convert-a-revenue-earning-idea-for-facebook/</link>
	<description>Business Ideas For All By All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IdeaTagging.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ideatagging.com/facebook-convert-a-revenue-earning-idea-for-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11346</link>
		<dc:creator>IdeaTagging.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideatagging.com/?p=132#comment-11346</guid>
		<description>Hi Jacob

Thanks for stopping by. I think you must have misunderstood me slightly. I did not mean to suggest that Facebook users would pay to get their friends&#039; recommendations, I meant the website publisher would pay for each response that a prospect received. I should perhaps have made that clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by. I think you must have misunderstood me slightly. I did not mean to suggest that Facebook users would pay to get their friends&#8217; recommendations, I meant the website publisher would pay for each response that a prospect received. I should perhaps have made that clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.ideatagging.com/facebook-convert-a-revenue-earning-idea-for-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-11345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideatagging.com/?p=132#comment-11345</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. I think you&#039;re on to something in regards to conversion. It seems logical that it could be the next trend in revenue modeling. But I&#039;m not convinced you could get away with charging Facebook users just to get feedback from friends about their friends&#039; experience with certain products. It seems that service is already available, even within the Facebook platform. Then again, perhaps I misunderstood you. I do, however, think you would have a better chance if the fee were charged when an actual response is received. That seems like a stronger value proposition. Also, Facebook could build this revenue model into a subscription-based service, up-selling advanced features that its users find valuable, including the ability to solicit feedback from friends about their experience with targeted services or products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I think you&#8217;re on to something in regards to conversion. It seems logical that it could be the next trend in revenue modeling. But I&#8217;m not convinced you could get away with charging Facebook users just to get feedback from friends about their friends&#8217; experience with certain products. It seems that service is already available, even within the Facebook platform. Then again, perhaps I misunderstood you. I do, however, think you would have a better chance if the fee were charged when an actual response is received. That seems like a stronger value proposition. Also, Facebook could build this revenue model into a subscription-based service, up-selling advanced features that its users find valuable, including the ability to solicit feedback from friends about their experience with targeted services or products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
